Brad Pitt Might Have Audio Tapes Of Angelina Jolie That Would Make Her Look Bad

November 12, 2016 / Posted by:

Let’s take bets. Which god-awful mess do you think will run longer – the Trump presidency or Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s divorce situation? I’m putting my Keno money down on Brad and Angie. Trump might only have four years to torture us. Think about it… Jennifer Aniston is still managing to find herself on magazine covers, and Brad left her ass over 12 years ago.

The Sun is claiming that Brad Pitt has some “dynamite” audio of Angelina Jolie that would mess up her chance for sole custody of their six children.

Speaking about the recordings, a Brangelina insider said: “We believe audio tapes exist of Angelina that would be absolutely dynamite against her if they were to be made public.

“Nobody wants to play dirty like that — it’s not good for the children — but Angelina and her team seem absolutely hell-bent on trying to discredit Brad in order to stop him getting joint custody.

What’s vastly irritating about this dubious item is that they don’t say what Angie is doing on the tapes that make them so “dynamite.” Does she reveal she’s planning on voting orange in the 2016 presidential election? Is she conducting a Satanic rite to make her immortal? Does she try to sing? Who knows?

They also claim that Angie plans on continuing to try and prove Brad slapped Maddox Jolie-Pitt around despite the recent closing of that investigation by Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Service.

But Gossip Cop rolled its digital eyes and issued a “nope” to The Sun, saying that no such tapes exist. That’s a shame. I wanted to hear Angie trying to cut a demo. Did The Sun borrow some money and not pay Gossip Cop back or something? Gossip Cop went way in on The Sun.

Curiously, the tabloid lobs the rumor about the existence of explosive recordings, but seemingly knows nothing about their contents nor offers how Pitt would leverage them.

Right? I said that, too! Gossip Cop gets me as a person.

A skeptic might suspect the British newspaper of manufacturing these claims. Or perhaps the paper relied on a highly unreliable “insider.” Irrespective of how the tabloid came to its story, it clearly was not fact-checked.

I take it these two media outlets won’t be drinking peppermint schnapps together at this year’s celebrity gossip blog Christmas party. Gossip Cop emphatically wants you to know THAT THERE ARE NO TAPES, AND THE SUN IS A LOWDOWN DIRTY LIE-TELLER. They’ve even got an insider! An “impeccable” one!

Regardless, Gossip Cop looked into The Sun’s claims, and they are not true. An impeccable Pitt insider has “no idea where this came from,” and exclusively assures us that it was “certainly not from a legitimate Brad source.”

Whatever the truth is, one question remains. Is “irrespective” a word? Because the jury is still out on “irregardless,” so why don’t we verify that one first before we keep adding to the “irre” family?


Our commenting rules are pretty simple: If you make any overly offensive comment (racist, bigoted, etc..) or go way off topic when not in an Open Post, your comments will be deleted and you will be banned. If you see an offensive or spammy comment you think should be deleted, flag it for the mods and they'll be forever grateful and give you their first born (although, you probably don't want that).

alt="drupal analytics" >