Top Pervert
There was an episode from last season's Top Chef: Just Desserts where they had to make edible outfits to match a pair of high heels and the show's runner-up, Morgan Wilson, nearly internally jizzed himself inside/out over this pair of red shoes. Really. I kept waiting for him to excuse himself so he could go into the pantry and fuck his peen hole with its heel. Like he's that kind of freak. The kind of dirty freak who will om nom nom on your panties if you left them on the floor and nibble on your pit hairs while you slept. I always got that kind of vibe from him, but I didn't ever think he was a freak of the illegal kind. But his sucio ass is, apparently.
ABC News says that Morgan was hit with a felony child porn charge a couple of weeks ago after undercover investigators caught him downloading illegal shit on Limewire last year. Yes, this motherfucker was using Limewire. Here's all the lovely details from ABC News that will make your pores barf:
The 38-year-old chef, who lives in Plano, is due in court Oct. 27.Wilson was first arrested on Dec. 7, 2010 after undercover investigators say they received several file transfers from Wilson via a peer-to-peer file-sharing service. Those files, received in Sept. 2010, allegedly contained images and videos of children, some as young as toddlers, engaged in sexual acts. Police subsequently searched Wilson’s home, where they say he signed and dated pornographic images he admitted he’d viewed. Wilson’s laptop computer and external hard drives also were confiscated. He was released on $10,000 bail following his December arrest and ordered not to use computers without supervision.
Wilson reportedly works as the executive pastry chef at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Dallas, though his name does not appear on the hotel’s website. He also has a young son, about whom he often spoke during his Top Chef: Just Desserts “confessional” segments.
And is this nasty herp derp-looking bitch wearing a Snuggie in his mug shot? Pack up your tools and go directly to jail!
• 
Mrs Patrick Campbell = obvious retarded troll-pedo.
And Heathen, I'll edit it, but you need to lay off the hate pie and stop spazzing the hell out over a typo. And I decline the fucking of me by your person since I don't want herpes. Also "read better" could be turned around to "don't quote like a fucktarded jesustit on acid", just fyi.
B!i!i!iD~
For your health.
As I understand it, he wasn't just viewing the material (which is awful enough), but sharing it with other users, thus aiding in its distribution.
So it's more than just viewing something on the internet.
Submitted by No Words on Sun, 10/23/2011 - 10:03am.
Mrs. Patrick Campbell's true colors coming out...now you all can see what a sick fuck he really is.
I have always pictured him as Buffalo Bill in "Silence of the Lambs" prancing around in front of his mirror in a "girl suit."
*shudders*
*********
*snort*
************
Joe Shmoe--Don't waste your intelligence on Mrs. Patrick Campbell. Trolls are resistant to education.
Mrs. Patrick Campbell's true colors coming out...now you all can see what a sick fuck he really is.
I have always pictured him as Buffalo Bill in "Silence of the Lambs" prancing around in front of his mirror in a "girl suit."
*shudders*
so, mpc, thanks for letting everyone know what a pedophile supporter you are ... if not a pedo yourself.
you look at this sewer eating muthafucka and all your stank fishface can think of are his rights to POSSESS child pornography.
you pity the pedophile.
protecting your own interests?
you are a dirty and sick muthafucka. a total piece of garbage.
-not to mention a fuckin liar.
u.s. constitution or europe's code of conduct, pick one you fake muthafucking ugly ratass.
*peddles off in a mint '88 yugo*
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YTkxr3j2HQ&feature=related
Well, I tried. I think you'd be better off dead. And if you could lure Roman Polanski in with your scrotum breath, please shove him up your gaping maw.
We have inspected more photos of Morgan and he is very HOT and obviously homosexual!
It gets curiouser and curiouser...
All the more curious since pedophilia (sex with people who don't yet have hair on their privates) is basically un-known in the 'mo world!
Submitted by Mrs Patrick Campbell on Sun, 10/23/2011 - 3:23am.
Sorry Shmoe, but here in Europe we are governed by Roman Law and Napoleanic Code....not the bullpoo-poo English tort law that you make reference to.
What the law says is what the judge says.
___________________________________________
Mrs Patrick Campbell, could you bother to make up your fucking mind on your defense of this guy? You cited the U.S. Constitution, erroneously, and now you want to apply your "Roman Law and Napoleanic Code" to this situation?
Sit your ass down and re-read the story above. This person was arrested in Texas, which is part of the United States, so your European sensibilities are not applicable. Furthermore, you've previously stated that you believe in your beloved Spain that the age of consent is 13; this guy's materials involved toddlers, and in case your Americanese is a bit rusty, a toddler is defined here in the U.S. as a child under the age of 6.
Don't be scared, baby; this guy didn't simply "look at something on the internet"; he sought out and downloaded these materials, several times. He downloaded them to a hard (don't get excited) drive located in the United States, where the protections of free speech and free press are not extended to subject matter created by the performance of illegal acts.
No one in the U.S. who has an internet connection has the excuse of ignorance of the law, and while I'm not a legal professional, I'm pretty sure that ignorance of the law is not a legal defense against the charge of a criminal act.
Sorry Shmoe, but here in Europe we are governed by Roman Law and Napoleonic Code....not the bullpoo-poo English tort law that you make reference to. This is why trial lawyers (aka 'ambulance chasers') can't make a penny here!
What the law says is what the judge says.
The fact that someone can be arrested and face a long prison term because he merely looked at something on the internet is scary beyond words.
Really, really scary.
The human brain is fully-developed at about age 20, so there is no way that a kid of, let's say 13, can oversee the consequences of having sex. Just a scientific fact for those who weren't open to more emotional arguments. All sexual relationships that are not entered upon in mutual consent by parties of 'sound' mind are by definition WRONG.
Furthermore, I would appreciate it if Mrs. Patrick Campbell left the rest of Europe out of the equation.
----------------------------------------------------------
Rusty, tu nous manque! Sois gentil et donne-nous de tes nouvelles!
He looks like that pervert murderer who was mentioned in clint eastwood's movie the changeling.
__________________
"The world is a pretty nice place if you're happy"
John Garfield
No one lives forever
Submitted by 3rd Eye Blonde on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 4:56pm.
Uncle Brain-fart on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 4:52pm.
Can someone kick the fucking troll in the throat please?
-----
Are you threatening me with bodily harm?
I'd think twice about that.
---------------------------------------
i usually don't respond to all this troll shit lately but
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo
what the fuck are you gonna do about it?
some of you fuckers are hilarious.
-----------------------------------------
A baby's first words should not be: "DEATH DON'T TAKE ME NOW!!!" - MK
Submitted by Mrs Patrick Campbell on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 3:20pm.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, OR OF THE PRESS;..."
The Consitution protects the right to VIEW any material a person chooses to view.
We said nothing about the production of such material, which is probably another matter.
Here in Europe, where we live, the age of sexual consent is between 13 and 16, depending on which country! Here in Spain we believe it is 13....what do you think about that!!
Personally we prefer full-grown men but whatever anyone does is ok with us as long as they don't bother us!
*********
The age of consent doesn't mean necessarily mean a 13 year old can *consent* to have sex with an adult. Without checking the law of Spain, I would say that like North American countries, while the age of consent may be 14 or 15, exceptions are always made by the prosecutor when the person this kid is having sex with is an "adult'; that is to say, in many cases, the *age of consent* doesn't mean consent to have sex with an adult; it means that sexual activity with another *child* (as defined in the criminal code of that country) is not illegal. A 14 year old having sex or sending sexual images to a 16 year old boyfriend, is a *whole* lot different to a 14 year old being forced to prostitute herself (or himself) so that some sleazebag on the net can make $$$$ by selling the image to pedophiles.
And yeah, I'm over your booooring, hateful *stinkfish* schtick, on a blog that is 95% female.
Do us all a favour, and go find a new audience that appreciates your humour.
************
I 'reference' facebook because that is the de jour conferencing/networking site.
*utilized the Reported function* Just done with this shit.
Everyone, later. Fk the delusional fks. Done with that shit here. Goodnight/Goodmorning. Everyone, just chill on Sunday. ugh.
_____
Bugs Bunny 'What's Opera, Doc?"- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2VMqQ6XnmI (Beginning portion)
Dre,Eminem, Skylar- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA770wpLX-Q&ob=av3e
Hi Hellraiser,
Meet us on the OP.
And welcome, slut!
(And glad that you kicked cancer's ass.)
Submitted by 3rd Eye Blonde on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 5:05pm.
A child in a bubble-bath that mommy took a photo of and placed on her facebook? NOT CHILD PORN (to NORMAL people anyway).
________
You keep referencing fb and other people's genuine pics. Why, Angela?
(Repeating this mess: 3rd, YOU referenced fb pics, per your post - Why state this? Why tie it into 'normal people' and a child porn post?
_____
Bugs Bunny 'What's Opera, Doc?"- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2VMqQ6XnmI (Beginning portion)
Dre,Eminem, Skylar- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA770wpLX-Q&ob=av3e
I need to vomit after looking at this thread.
Let's nuke it.
Hellraiser, congrats on beating the big "C"! (assuming you aren't Angela).
Submitted by 3rd Eye Blonde on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 4:19pm.
Submitted by Bjork You on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 4:03pm.
"Also, I and other parents were photographing our own kids at a Halloween harvest festival today, sometimes capturing other children in our photos. I might post them in my private album on Facebook or send to friends. Am I violating someone? They're not for profit of any kind. Gee, I miss those days when a photo was just a photo was just a photo. But then again, maybe those days never really existed."
Bjork you, people can make and spread all kinds of things that are both illegal and for free. Non-profit kiddie porn is still kiddie porn. A child who is posing with a dildo in a provocative way and this photo is spread around the internet is KIDDIE PORN. A photo of your kid in a bubble bath just playing with his rubber ducky is NOT.
=========
My post was appealing to the smarter posters on dlisted, not you. I am not talking about something so obvious as "A child who is posing with a dildo in a provocative way and this photo is spread around the internet is KIDDIE PORN. A photo of your kid in a bubble bath just playing with his rubber ducky is NOT."
To others, I am thinking now of the Sally Mann controversy, as well as that other female photographer who photographs her kids. I happen to love her photography, including her monograph "Immediate Family." She got into all sorts of hot water with people like art connoisseur Jesse Helms. Mann is no child pornographer, and her children are happy, smart functioning adults.
The entire system needs to be looked at, from the parents to the governmental and non-profit agencies that are supposed to protect them (and those agencies losing funding) to the abusers in their many forms to the consumers.
The whole thing turns my stomach and make my heart ache.
Angela, talk to us. This shit has got to be confronted and addressed, for your benefit more than ours. Plus, it's a mfking pain in the ass for everyone. So, Why? Seriously. Wtf? Just release your shit. Here. Why the fuck not?
Eta - I'm just goddamn sick of this shit. We (all of us around the damn world) are more alike than we think. We are NOT each others' enemies for fuck's sake. Damn.
EETA or whatever - 3rd, if you're not 'Angela' or any other recurring alt with history here, then nevermind. Separately, hugs, again, to you all who keep humanity -blogwise or whatever- in check.
_____
Bugs Bunny 'What's Opera, Doc?"- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2VMqQ6XnmI (Beginning portion)
Dre,Eminem, Skylar- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA770wpLX-Q&ob=av3e
God, it seems Top Perv is only one of many sick fucks in this thread.
*************************************************
All y'all going to Hell with gasoline drawers!
*hugs to Cappy and No Words*
I don't usually comment on threads like this, but...anyone who watches, sells, purchases, makes or supplies the children for kiddie porn should be jailed for life, or worse if the situation calls for it. There is nothing funny about it.
Especially not to the children who are being exploited.
***********************************************
Time cast a spell on you but
You won't forget me
I know I could have loved you but
You would not let me
-Fleetwood Mac
Submitted by 3rd Eye Blonde on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 5:05pm.
A child in a bubble-bath that mommy took a photo of and placed on her facebook? NOT CHILD PORN (to NORMAL people anyway).
________
You keep referencing fb and other people's genuine pics. Why, Angela?
_____
Bugs Bunny 'What's Opera, Doc?"- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2VMqQ6XnmI (Beginning portion)
Dre,Eminem, Skylar- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA770wpLX-Q&ob=av3e
Caprica six and Hotmami...*big huge hugs*
Okay, Mrs. Patrick Campbell should be reported for being a sick fuck...I would love to report his ass.
And Third Eye Blonde...jaysus, get a clue. No one wants you here. Especially not MK.
Submitted by 3rd Eye Blonde on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 4:09pm.
What equates child porn?
I think it's an obvious sexual violation of a child (I hope to HELL I don't EVER have to describe what 'obvious' is...EVER).
A child in a bubble-bath that mommy took a photo of and placed on her facebook? NOT CHILD PORN (to NORMAL people anyway).
Life is fucking SHORT. Robbing a child of their innocence and their innate childhood is EVIL.
-------
re-posted because some of you have the reading comprehension of a gnat.
*peeks back into thread*
I wish MK would take this post down. There is some great commentary in here but some of it gives me the sads and some of it gives me the hates.
True story: I was home on disability for five months this year while undergoing cancer treatment. I was so nauseated I could only watch "fluff" on TV or lie very still with a "fluff" novel. I started watching Nickelodeon's "Victorious" and fell madly in lust with one of the show's actors (Avan Jogia). I sincerely feared that I was a pedophile... until I googled him and found out he's 19. What a fucking relief that was! Oh, and I found Dlisted and all you peeps. (Most of) you are hilarious mf'ers. Sorry to introduce myself belatedly in a non-open post but I am trying to lighten the mood. Oh, and I kicked cancer's ass!
I don't know about you all but it's a fine October Saturday evening where I am. I am happy just to be alive. How about you?
_________________________________________________
"When I come up, I rush, I rush for you..."
{{{Hots and UBF}}}
edit - Your fairies and my fairies are the guardians and warriors of bullshit. The cunts on here have a new generation to contend with. Trust.
damnit edit; it's Saturday night, shit.
_____
Bugs Bunny 'What's Opera, Doc?"- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2VMqQ6XnmI (Beginning portion)
Dre,Eminem, Skylar- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA770wpLX-Q&ob=av3e
*sigh* That is all.
***********************************************
Time cast a spell on you but
You won't forget me
I know I could have loved you but
You would not let me
-Fleetwood Mac
Submitted by 3rd Eye Blonde on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 4:09pm.
What equates child porn?
__________
3rd - "what equates child porn?" - Fking excuse me?! Shut shit down, hor. Sleep on your question. Grow a thought/soul, cunt. Ridiculous.
_____
Bugs Bunny 'What's Opera, Doc?"- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2VMqQ6XnmI (Beginning portion)
Dre,Eminem, Skylar- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA770wpLX-Q&ob=av3e
Uncle Brain-fart on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 4:52pm.
Can someone kick the fucking troll in the throat please?
-----
Are you threatening me with bodily harm?
I'd think twice about that.
CHILDREN? AGES 2- 10?
So, 'newborns' are okay with you, Jintess?
That's fucked up.
Can someone kick the fucking troll in the throat please?
-------------------------------------------------
Well, aren't you just the cosmopolitan Queen Bee of Cuntsville? No, I'm sorry, of "Cuntropolis". Please excuse us in all of our inbred grandpa fucking glory. Karen Flatts, 09/21/11
Submitted by 3rd Eye Blonde on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 4:09pm.
What equates child porn?
_______________________
CHILDREN? AGES 2- 10?
Did you even read the article?
Oh I forgot. It's all about you
Fucking gross. Enjoy the cuisine in federal prison, shithead.
_______________________________________________
I wake up in the morning and I piss excellence.
And I thought dating a young twinkie 18 year old was disturbing, oh dear.
*************
Don't hate me cause I'm DLeautiful
"Hypothetically"
Would I upload my picture as my avatar, then chicken out and take it down whilst telling another commenter how much 'hotter' I am than she is and then cry 'party foul' when she posts my picture and shows me what an pathetic, fug asshat I am?
Wahhhhhhhh much?
Submitted by 3rd Eye Blonde on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 4:19pm.
Submitted by Bjork You on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 4:03pm.
"Also, I and other parents were photographing our own kids at a Halloween harvest festival today, sometimes capturing other children in our photos. I might post them in my private album on Facebook or send to friends. Am I violating someone? They're not for profit of any kind. Gee, I miss those days when a photo was just a photo was just a photo. But then again, maybe those days never really existed."
Bjork you, people can make and spread all kinds of things that are both illegal and for free. Non-profit kiddie porn is still kiddie porn. A child who is posing with a dildo in a provocative way and this photo is spread around the internet is KIDDIE PORN. A photo of your kid in a bubble bath just playing with his rubber ducky is NOT.
I have some adorable photos of my daughter's bare hiney in the sun when she had jaundice as a newborn and I was 'sunning' her per my midwife's advice. THAT is not child porn either. Would I post those online? NEVER. But, that's me. Not you and I don't judge you if you post innocent pictures of a naked baby so long as that naked baby isn't being obviously violated or exploited in some way.
Make sense?
_____________________________________
But hypothetically would you post another Dlisted posters photo and threaten that you put them on porno sites? Hypothetical of course.
.
Did everybody just read what Mrs Patrick Campbell wrote? In regards to the raping and abusing of children, he said it "doesn't matter" to him what anybody else does so long as it "doesn't bother" him.
I don't feel comfortable visiting a blog with a pedophile (or pedophile supporter) commenting next to me. I'm gonna petition the moderator about Mrs Patrick Campbell. Surely there are laws about people like him. How can anyone flaunt their immorality and perversion so openly? For example, if he were advocating terrorism, wouldn't I have a right to report his ass and ask that he be stopped? Heck, I bet I could call the F.B.I for that! Do people in an anonymous online forum have any moral or legal responsibility whatsoever?
Submitted by Bjork You on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 4:03pm.
"Also, I and other parents were photographing our own kids at a Halloween harvest festival today, sometimes capturing other children in our photos. I might post them in my private album on Facebook or send to friends. Am I violating someone? They're not for profit of any kind. Gee, I miss those days when a photo was just a photo was just a photo. But then again, maybe those days never really existed."
Bjork you, people can make and spread all kinds of things that are both illegal and for free. Non-profit kiddie porn is still kiddie porn. A child who is posing with a dildo in a provocative way and this photo is spread around the internet is KIDDIE PORN. A photo of your kid in a bubble bath just playing with his rubber ducky is NOT.
I have some adorable photos of my daughter's bare hiney in the sun when she had jaundice as a newborn and I was 'sunning' her per my midwife's advice. THAT is not child porn either. Would I post those online? NEVER. But, that's me. Not you and I don't judge you if you post innocent pictures of a naked baby so long as that naked baby isn't being obviously violated or exploited in some way.
Make sense?
Submitted by 3rd Eye Blonde on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 4:11pm.
Enough now, Angela. It was fun playing with you the other night, but now you should just go away. And think about what I wrote to you earlier about abuse. I am not putting you in the category of child molester, but I am putting you in a category of someone who should temper her self rightousness, especially one that is fronted by a false persona, one of many that leads to a nasty, racist attention whore.
And here is a story about how power operates on another level regarding this issue. An NYU professor is found with a stash of child porn and an IT worker reports it. Guess who kept a job and guess who lost one.
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/crimelaw/features/n_8815/
Mrs Patrick Campbell on Sat, 10/22/2011 - 3:20pm.
"Here in Europe"
Enough said, freak.
" Here in Spain we believe it is 13....what do you think about that!"
I think it's fucking disgusting but, hey, I'm a proud Puritanical American.
Sarah Smile
What equates child porn?
I think it's an obvious sexual violation of a child (I hope to HELL I don't EVER have to describe what 'obvious' is...EVER).
A child in a bubble-bath that mommy took a photo of and placed on her facebook? NOT CHILD PORN (to NORMAL people anyway).
Life is fucking SHORT. Robbing a child of their innocence and their innate childhood is EVIL.
Mrs. Patrick Campbell: you either need to attend or revisit law school. You are actually 100 percent incorrect in your interpretation of the Constitution.
Sarah Smile
Oh dear, how to word this.
I look at porn only once in a teeny weeny while (well, more than that) and sometimes, once in a teeny weeny while, masturbate to (on? over?) it (well, maybe more than sometimes). I am not defending makers and watchers of child porn, and I aware that Pedo Chef admitted to watching it, as well a doing so over a period of time. And even though he might have only been a watcher, his viewing is contributing to the supply and demand of such a market. That said, I am wondering about pop ups or inadvertently viewing something that I recognize as (1) yuck, not for me and (2) that is illegal. For example, I might view something, "Teen Slut," and the actors/models are clearly over 18, like clicking "Cougars" and it's a porn actress who I know is only 30 or so. If I did this, could the FBI track me and brand me a pervert of some kind for that?
And I shuddered about what someone wrote about how a person can get hold of your wireless whatchacallit if it's not password protected, cruise illegal porn (child, torture, animal, etc.), and the FBI will trace it back to the person who has the wireless internet connection, the person who wasn't viewing it.
And I think Mrs. Patrick Campbell raises an interesting point about the age of consent, which varies from state to state in the U.S. and in various countries. Of course I am not talking about toddler porn, but about how the age of consent is determined (and why).
Also, I and other parents were photographing our own kids at a Halloween harvest festival today, sometimes capturing other children in our photos. I might post them in my private album on Facebook or send to friends. Am I violating someone? They're not for profit of any kind. Gee, I miss those days when a photo was just a photo was just a photo. But then again, maybe those days never really existed.
These are just questions that I hope can be answered in the spirit of a discussion rather than a hunt to decipher if I am a child molester.